IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejbmr0/v7y2022i1id51201.html

Open Innovation Practices and Open Innovation Culture in the Life-Sciences Clusters. The Case of AstraZeneca

Author

Listed:
  • Małgorzata Runiewicz-Wardyn

    (Kozminski University, Poland)

  • Teona Eliashvili

    (Kozminski University, Poland)

Abstract

The study contributes to the emerging debate on the open innovation ecosystems by sharing insights and knowledge on the open innovation practices in life sciences sector, using the example of Cambridge cluster and its linkages with AstraZeneca. The authors applied descriptive data analysis and case study method. The study shows that decentralisation of corporate R&D process and investments into building an open innovation culture enabled AstraZeneca to exploit its local knowledge and information more effectively. The example of AstraZeneca allows to understand better the phenomenon of open innovation and shares some of the open innovation instruments, which could be adopted by other firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Małgorzata Runiewicz-Wardyn & Teona Eliashvili, 2022. "Open Innovation Practices and Open Innovation Culture in the Life-Sciences Clusters. The Case of AstraZeneca," European Journal of Business and Management Research, European Open Science, vol. 7(1), pages 35-43, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejbmr0:v:7:y:2022:i:1:id:51201
    DOI: 10.24018/ejbmr.2022.7.1.1201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbmr/article/view/51201
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbmr/article/download/51201/7359
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejbmr.2022.7.1.1201?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejbmr0:v:7:y:2022:i:1:id:51201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.