IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejbmr0/v6y2021i2id50817.html

Previous Years Audit Opinions, Profitability, Audit Tenure and Quality Control System on Going Concern Audit Opinion

Author

Listed:
  • Aji Purnama Ramadhan

    (Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Indonesia)

  • Mahendro Sumardjo

    (Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Indonesia)

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine the effect of the previous year's audit opinion, profitability, audit tenure, and quality control systems on going concern audit opinion. This study uses mining sector companies and public accounting firms (PAF) that audited as samples in the study. The data analysis technique used is Path Analysis with Smart PLS 3 with a significance level of 5%. The result indicates that previous year's audit opinion, profitability has a significant impact on going concern audit opinion, meanwhile, audit tenure and quality control system have not significant. Furthermore, other results from this study indicate that the audit tenure, quality control system, and previous year's audit opinion through the quality control system has no effect on going concern audit opinion. The implication of this study to the company is expected to pay attention to various factors, especially financial conditions that can have an influence on going concern audit opinion because this opinion gives a warning to the company.

Suggested Citation

  • Aji Purnama Ramadhan & Mahendro Sumardjo, 2021. "Previous Years Audit Opinions, Profitability, Audit Tenure and Quality Control System on Going Concern Audit Opinion," European Journal of Business and Management Research, European Open Science, vol. 6(2), pages 140-145, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejbmr0:v:6:y:2021:i:2:id:50817
    DOI: 10.24018/ejbmr.2021.6.2.817
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbmr/article/view/50817
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbmr/article/download/50817/7111
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejbmr.2021.6.2.817?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejbmr0:v:6:y:2021:i:2:id:50817. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.