IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejbmr0/v6y2021i1id50741.html

The Case for Agile Methodologies against Traditional Ones in Financial Software Projects

Author

Listed:
  • V. P. Munteanu

    (West University of Timisoara, Romania)

  • P. Dragos

    (West University of Timisoara, Romania)

Abstract

Agile methodologies have emerged to challenge traditional ones and overcome their limitations. Increasingly, software development organizations are scaling agile practices in order to meet the requirements of the quickly changing and regularly developing business environment. The main objectives of this study are to investigate the main differences between the traditional project management methodologies and agile methodologies, as well as to identify some key advantages and challenges of applying agile development in a financial software environment. The findings clearly show that using Agile methodologies in a financial software development environment increases the efficiency and transparency of the development process, as well as the stakeholders’ satisfaction, but the project managers must know how to adapt different Agile frameworks to the given context of their organization.

Suggested Citation

  • V. P. Munteanu & P. Dragos, 2021. "The Case for Agile Methodologies against Traditional Ones in Financial Software Projects," European Journal of Business and Management Research, European Open Science, vol. 6(1), pages 134-141, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejbmr0:v:6:y:2021:i:1:id:50741
    DOI: 10.24018/ejbmr.2021.6.1.741
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbmr/article/view/50741
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbmr/article/download/50741/7073
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejbmr.2021.6.1.741?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejbmr0:v:6:y:2021:i:1:id:50741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.