Author
Listed:
- Aly Saad Mohamed Dawood
(Heliopolis University, Egypt.)
- Omar H. Eldahan
(Heliopolis University, Egypt.)
Abstract
This research aims to evaluate Egyptian banks’ sustainable performance and to rank them according to the assessing framework criteria. The researchers depended on the 2017 annual reports of 26 Egyptian banks and sustainability reports (if available). Then, the banks were categorized according to their type (public, private, or Islamic). Finally, the banks’ total assets were extracted in order to further categorize the banks into small and large based on the threshold of EGP 75 billion. The data from the reports were analyzed using the content analysis application NPV11 to measure the sustainability adoption score. Then, a Kruskal-Wallis test was used to determine if there is a significant difference in sustainability banking performance score of public, private and Islamic sector banks in Egypt. Finally, a Spearman’s Rank Correlation was used to test correlation between bank size and sustainability adoption score. The results showed that there are only two banks that have significantly began to adopt sustainability practices from the private sector while no public or Islamic Bank showed any significant implementation. Furthermore, results reveled that there are nine banks with a score greater than zero and this was reasoned to be a result of the initiatives of the Central Bank of Egypt to provide low-interest loans to support small startup enterprises. Then, it was found that there isn’t significant difference in sustainability banking performance score of public, private and Islamic banks in Egypt. Finally, no significant relation between bank size and sustainability adoption score in Egypt was identified.
Suggested Citation
Aly Saad Mohamed Dawood & Omar H. Eldahan, 2020.
"Assessing the Level of Sustainability in the Egyptian Banking Sector,"
European Journal of Business and Management Research, European Open Science, vol. 5(2), March.
Handle:
RePEc:epw:ejbmr0:v:5:y:2020:i:2:id:50275
DOI: 10.24018/ejbmr.2020.5.2.275
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejbmr0:v:5:y:2020:i:2:id:50275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbmr .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.