Author
Listed:
- Yu-Ling Lin
(National Chin-Yi University of Technology, Taiwan.)
- Hong-Wen Lin
(Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.)
- Hui-Jun Chen
(National Chin-Yi University of Technology, Taiwan.)
Abstract
This research is developed to study the information and considerations adopted by college and master-degree students when operating the Business Operations Simulation System under various kinds of operation scenarios and the approaches used by them for integrating the variations of different business management knowledge. In this research, the protocol analysis is conducted to acquire the historical information of their mental activities, supported with experimental design to create the information recognition based comparative experiment to know how the decisions are made by students. Finally, the analysis and verification results are compared to obtain the behavioral features of students in problem solving and the process of information processing that can be physically described. According to the research, the results indicated that college students require more complicated thinking steps when solving the problem but their thinking elements required for decision-making are not as inclusive as master-degree students. Being less familiar with the issue of decision-making, the college students are normally unable to make correct decisions and work out the solutions; instead, they tend to proceed with thinking and judgment by intuitive method. Being more comprehensive in learning experiences and knowledge accumulation, the master-degree students are able to comprehend he provided information more quickly and they also develop specific kinds of solutions. Therefore, they are able to execute the decision and set up decision items in a more direct way.
Suggested Citation
Yu-Ling Lin & Hong-Wen Lin & Hui-Jun Chen, 2019.
"Study on Student’s Decision-making Behavior Mode with Business Operations Simulation System through Protocol Analysis,"
European Journal of Business and Management Research, European Open Science, vol. 4(5), September.
Handle:
RePEc:epw:ejbmr0:v:4:y:2019:i:5:id:50110
DOI: 10.24018/ejbmr.2019.4.5.110
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejbmr0:v:4:y:2019:i:5:id:50110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbmr .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.