IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejbmr0/v11y2026i3id70239.html

A Knowledge Graph–Based Framework for Predicting Sprint Performance in Agile Software Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Altantsetseg Gelegbalsan

    (National University of Mongolia, Mongolia)

  • Enkhtuul Bukhsuren

    (National University of Mongolia, Mongolia)

  • Munkhtsetseg Namsraidorj

    (National University of Mongolia, Mongolia)

Abstract

Agile software development is widely adopted in modern software organizations because it enables teams to deliver software incrementally and respond quickly to changing requirements. Despite its advantages, analyzing sprint performance remains challenging since project data are often distributed across multiple tools and systems and do not clearly represent the relationships between development activities. This study examines factors influencing sprint performance using knowledge graph modeling combined with regression analysis. Project data describing sprints, tasks, team members, and requirement changes were collected from agile development records. After preprocessing, these data were organized into a knowledge graph using the Neo4j graph database. This structure makes it possible to examine relationships such as task dependencies and coordination among team members during sprint execution. The study focuses on indicators related to task dependencies, workload distribution, and coordination patterns. The analysis is based on data from 380 sprints carried out by six agile development teams over a five-year period. Sprint performance is evaluated using the Sprint Completion Rate, which indicates how much of the planned story point workload is completed within a sprint. Task dependency depth is related to sprint performance, with higher values associated with improved sprint completion in this dataset. In addition, higher betweenness centrality (normalized) within the task dependency network is positively related to sprint performance, suggesting that well-coordinated task structures contribute to more effective sprint execution. The regression model explains approximately 48.9% of the variation in sprint completion rates. Overall, the results suggest that structural indicators derived from knowledge graphs help reveal patterns in agile development processes that are difficult to observe using traditional tabular data. The integration of graph-based indicators with regression- based analysis provides a practical framework for understanding sprint performance and supporting decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Altantsetseg Gelegbalsan & Enkhtuul Bukhsuren & Munkhtsetseg Namsraidorj, 2026. "A Knowledge Graph–Based Framework for Predicting Sprint Performance in Agile Software Projects," European Journal of Business and Management Research, European Open Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-10, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejbmr0:v:11:y:2026:i:3:id:70239
    DOI: 10.24018/ejbmr.2026.11.3.70239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbmr/article/view/70239
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbmr/article/download/70239/14318
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejbmr.2026.11.3.70239?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejbmr0:v:11:y:2026:i:3:id:70239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.