IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejbmr0/v10y2025i6id52553.html

The Effect of Tendering Strategy on Service Delivery of Water Flagship Projects in Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan Lenkang Meijo

    (University of Nairobi, Kenya)

  • Magutu Obara Peterson

    (University of Nairobi, Kenya)

  • Kate Litondo

    (University of Nairobi, Kenya)

Abstract

Tendering is a subset of procurement (broadspectrum) that involves the critical step of inviting and evaluating bids from potential contractors to carry out specific parts of the project. Together, these processes dictate the operational efficiency and economic feasibility of construction projects and ensure adherence to quality, legal standards, and fair-trade practices. As we explore these pivotal components of construction project management, we uncover the strategies, challenges, and best practices that guide successful project outcomes in an ever-evolving construction landscape. The Kenyan government has consistently raised funding for hygiene and water flagship programes. In the 2013–2014 financial year, for example, the overall growth spending on water supply and related services increased from KShs. 20.5 billion in 2012–2013 to KShs. 44.5 billion. This study concentrates on the influence of tendering on service delivery at a strategic level instead of routines, procedures, and practices, or the overall procurement strategy. Thus, this research respond to the following research question: What is the impact of the tendering strategy on the service delivery of water flagship projects in Kenya? The specific objective of this study is to establish the effects of a tendering strategy on the delivery service of water flagship projects in Kenya. The results show that the effects of tendering strategy on the service delivery of water flagship projects in Kenya are statistically significant. The results of the variable-level analysis indicate that 75.0% of the total tendering approach explains differences in service delivery, while the results of the indicator-level analysis indicate that 56.7% of the total variations in service delivery are explained by four indicators of tendering strategy: negotiated tendering, two-stage tendering-, and -single-stage competitive tendering. This study empirically tested the link between tendering strategy and service delivery outside the challenges documented by study on the domestic governance structure and urban service delivery in Zimbabwe and found that their relationship is statistically significant. This study makes an important contribution to the literature for policymakers. The Kenya National Water Policy elaborates on the development of various policies, regulatory and legislative frameworks to guide the water sector in Kenya. This advanced the concept of tendering strategy and service delivery as studied on this paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan Lenkang Meijo & Magutu Obara Peterson & Kate Litondo, 2025. "The Effect of Tendering Strategy on Service Delivery of Water Flagship Projects in Kenya," European Journal of Business and Management Research, European Open Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-9, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejbmr0:v:10:y:2025:i:6:id:52553
    DOI: 10.24018/ejbmr.2025.10.6.2553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbmr/article/view/52553
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbmr/article/download/52553/8780
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejbmr.2025.10.6.2553?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejbmr0:v:10:y:2025:i:6:id:52553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.