Author
Listed:
- Soumia Nachate
(a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:161:"Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Toxicology, Avicenna Military Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakech 40000, Morocco";})
- Hind Zrikem
(Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Toxicology, Avicenna Military Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakech 40000, Morocco)
- Fayrouz Debbagh
(Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Toxicology, Avicenna Military Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakech 40000, Morocco)
- Saliha Chellak
(Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Toxicology, Avicenna Military Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakech 40000, Morocco)
- Abderrahman Boukhira
(Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Toxicology, Avicenna Military Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakech 40000, Morocco)
Abstract
The Atellica® CH 930 is a new biochemistry analyzer recently introduced to the world market. This study aims to compare the Atellica® CH 930 analyzer to the Architect® ci4100 analyzer for measurement of serum aspartate (AST) and alanine (ALT) aminotransferase concentrations. A total of 112 sera were tested on the Architect® ci4100 and the Atellica® CH 930 analyzers for ALT and AST activities, and the results were compared using the paired Student's t-test, Pearson’s correlation analysis, Passing-Bablok regression analysis, and Bland–Altman plots. There was no significant difference between the means of the ALT and AST concentrations measured using the two instruments (p = 0.659 and p = 0.506, respectively). For ALT, the Passing-Bablok equation was Atellica=1.11 ×Architect -0.96, with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.999. For AST, it was Atellica=1.08 ×Architect -0.50, with r = 0.998. According to Bland-Altman plots, the mean difference between both methods was 2.3 IU/L (4.3%) for ALT and 2.1 IU/L (5.8%) for AST, with 95.53% and 96.43% of points within the interval [0 ± 1.96 × SD], respectively. These findings demonstrated that the Atellica® CH 930 and Architect® ci4100 methods had an overall good agreement in aminotransferase measurement.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:epw:ejbio0:v:4:y:2023:i:3:id:17472
DOI: 10.24018/ejbio.2023.4.4.472
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejbio0:v:4:y:2023:i:3:id:17472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbio .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.