Author
Listed:
- Ugochi Adaku Okengwu
(University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria)
- Hillard Azino Akpughe
(University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria)
- Eyinanabo Odogu
(University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria)
- Taiye Ojetunmibi
(University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria)
- Deshinta Arrova Dewi
(INTI International University, Malaysia)
- Tri Basuki Kurniawan
(Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Malaysia)
Abstract
Farming is experiencing a shift in Artificial Intelligence (AI), opening its doors to precision farming, improving method for disease tracking, and providing smarter management of agricultural resources. Despite this new wave, it is also accompanied by sets of ethical questions regarding transparency, fairness, and privacy of data. While these questions are debated in industries, the focus has not shifted to how the principles play out in the fields. This study aims to determine whether global and regional AI frameworks truly fit the needs of agricultural farmers and users, and seeks to determine how knowledgeable farmers, researchers, and developers are about ethical AI. To obtain a clear understanding, a mixed approach of reviewing existing works and conducting a survey with AI professionals and agricultural workers was adopted. The results from the study proved to be a wake-up call, with over half the audience surveyed not being familiar with ethical AI concepts and only about 28% knowing about any actual regulations or policies of AI. Despite this, there was general agreement that the burden of ethics is not on one person but on everyone involved in the development, legislation, and farmers who use the tool. In addition, areas such as China, the UAE, and the EU, which adopted AI frameworks early, based on the findings, showed that they gained traction in agricultural innovations. The study concluded by suggesting that better policy outreach through education and cross-field collaborations would enable AI to support sustainable farming and protect farmers rights.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:epw:ejai00:v:5:y:2026:i:2:id:70101
DOI: 10.24018/ejai.2026.5.2.70101
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejai00:v:5:y:2026:i:2:id:70101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejai .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.