Author
Listed:
- Nafisa Tasnim Neha
(Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology (AUST), Bangladesh)
- Anamika Saha
(Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology (AUST), Bangladesh)
- Md. Abu Obayda
(Bangladesh University of Health Sciences (BUHS), Bangladesh)
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising tool in radiology, particularly chest radiography, where timely and accurate diagnosis is critical for patient care. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of a deep learning model, DenseNet-121, with radiologist reports of chest X-ray (CXR) images in a hospital setting in Dhaka, Bangladesh. A total of 50 posteroanterior (P/A) chest X-rays were collected from a single hospital and analyzed independently using the DenseNet-121 algorithm and radiologists. The AI system reported 42 images as normal and eight as abnormal, identifying findings such as pneumonitis, pleural effusion, cardiomegaly, lung opacities, nodules, and tracheal shift. In contrast, radiologists classified 37 images as normal and 13 as abnormal using standard reporting formats that assessed lung fields, heart, basal angles, diaphragm, bony thorax, and tracheal position. The comparative analysis revealed areas of concordance, particularly in normal findings, where both the AI and radiologists demonstrated similar interpretations. However, discrepancies were noted in the abnormal cases. While AI occasionally fails to localize specific pathologies, radiologists also miss abnormalities in a few instances, possibly due to workload or reporting variations. These differences underscore the complementary role of AI, which, despite requiring further training and refinement, can provide significant support for diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. Overall, this study highlights the potential of DenseNet-121 as an assistive diagnostic tool for chest radiography in resource-constrained health care settings. By enhancing radiologists’ confidence and reducing diagnostic oversight, AI can contribute to improved clinical decision making and patient outcomes in Bangladesh and beyond.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:epw:ejai00:v:4:y:2025:i:6:id:1085
DOI: 10.24018/ejai.2025.4.6.85
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejai00:v:4:y:2025:i:6:id:1085. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejai .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.