Author
Listed:
- Martha Ozohu Musa
(University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria)
- Temitope Victor-Ime
(University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria)
Abstract
The presence of malicious traffic presents a substantial risk to network systems and the integrity of confidential information. Organisations may enhance their protection against threats and mitigate the possible impact of malicious traffic on their networks by maintaining vigilance, deploying comprehensive security measures, and cultivating a cybersecurity-aware culture. The purpose of this study is to propose a theoretical framework for identifying and analysing potentially harmful network traffic within a network system. In order to identify and classify various types of malicious network traffic in a multi-class setting, we employed a dataset consisting of nine distinct categories of network system attacks. In order to optimise the performance of the model, an exploratory data analysis is conducted on the dataset. Exploratory data analysis (EDA) was employed to assess various aspects like the presence of missing values, correlation among characteristics, data imbalance, and identification of significant features. The findings derived from the exploratory data analysis indicate that the dataset exhibits an imbalance, which, if left unaddressed, may result in overfitting. The data imbalance was addressed with the implementation of the RandomOverSampling approach in Python, which involved executing random oversampling. Following the resolution of the data imbalance, a random forest classifier was employed to extract significant features from the dataset. In this study, a total of ten characteristics were extracted based on the ranking provided by the random forest model. The features that were extracted were utilised in the training process of the suggested model, which aims to identify and detect malicious activity within a network system. The findings of the model indicate a much improved level of accuracy in identifying malicious traffic within a network system, with an accuracy rate of 99.99%. Furthermore, the precision, recall, and F1-score metrics also demonstrate a consistent accuracy rate of 99.99%.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:epw:ejai00:v:3:y:2024:i:2:id:1038
DOI: 10.24018/ejai.2024.3.2.38
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejai00:v:3:y:2024:i:2:id:1038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejai .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.