IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/comput/v2y2022i3id10067.html

A Review on Parkinson's Disease Detection Methods: Traditional Machine Learning Models vs. Deep Learning Models

Author

Listed:
  • Md. Toukir Ahmed

    (Rajshahi University of Engineering and Technology, Bangladesh)

  • Md. Nazrul Islam Mondal

    (Rajshahi University of Engineering and Technology, Bangladesh)

  • Debashis Gupta

    (Rajshahi University of Engineering and Technology, Bangladesh)

  • Mohammed Sowket Ali

    (Bangladesh Army University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh)

Abstract

Millions of people throughout the world suffer with Parkinson's disease (PD), severely reducing their quality of life. With the symptoms when we detect Parkinson disease automatically, it could provide insights to the disease's early stages of development, enhancing the patients' projected clinical results through correctly focused therapies. This potential has prompted numerous academics to explore ways for measuring and quantifying the existence of PD symptoms using commercially available sensors. In this paper, we offer an overview of some recent scientific articles on several machine learning techniques that assist physiologists in detecting PD early. In addition, a comparative study between traditional machine learning (TML) algorithms and deep learning (DL) architectures based on the scope of their appropriate usage for classifying PD effectively has been discussed. Based on the comparison on detecting the PD from previous works, this paper concludes that deep learning models are more efficacious than traditional machine learning algorithms.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:epw:comput:v:2:y:2022:i:3:id:10067
DOI: 10.24018/compute.2022.2.3.67
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/compute/article/view/10067
File Function: Abstract page
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/compute/article/download/10067/1797
File Function: Full text
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/compute.2022.2.3.67?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:comput:v:2:y:2022:i:3:id:10067. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/compute .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.