IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/clinic/v7y2026i3id70444.html

Burden of Nosocomial Surgical Site Infections at Three Tertiary Hospitals in Copperbelt Province, Zambia

Author

Listed:
  • Seke M. E. Kazuma
  • Chitalu Chanda
  • Bright Chirengendure
  • Joshua Chisanga
  • Stanley Zulu
  • Chalwe Mumba
  • Laulindah Shiku
  • Simba Kaja
  • Nachor Bunda
  • Emmanuel Makasa
  • Gershom Chongwe
  • Muleya Inambao

Abstract

Introduction: Hospital-acquired infections (HAI) are nosocomial infections that develop after 48 hours of admission, and surgical site infections (SSI) are a major and significant contributor, with high morbidity and mortality, catastrophic healthcare costs, prolonged hospital stays, and poor quality of life. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of nosocomial SSI and their susceptibility profiles at three teaching hospitals in Zambia. Methodology: This prospective cohort study was conducted at three tertiary hospitals in the Copperbelt Province of Zambia. Results: A total of 1 122 participants were included in the study. Of these, 468 were female and 654 were male. The prevalence of nosocomial SSI in the three teaching hospitals was 21%, representing 95 of the 478 participants. The five most common cultured organisms were Staphylococcus aureus (23%), Enterobacter agglomerans (14%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (11%), Proteus mirabilis (10%), and Escherichia coli (9%). Most isolates were sensitive to meropenem (15%), chloramphenicol (15%), metronidazole (15%), and septrin (11%) and were resistant to ciprofloxacin (36%), azithromycin (13%), gentamycin (11%), and penicillin (10%). Conclusion: The prevalence of Nosocomial SSI was 21%. The cultured bacterial isolates were Staphylococcus aereus (23%), Enterobacter agglomerans (14%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (11%), Proteus mirabilis (10%), and Escherichia coli (9%). Susceptibility results showed sensitivity to meropenem (15%), chloramphenicol (15%), metronidazole (15%), and septrin (11%), and resistance to ciprofloxacin (36%), azithromycin (13%), gentamycin (11%), and penicillin (10%). Our study recommends chloramphenicol or meropenem in combination with metronidazole as first- and second-line treatments, respectively, for nosocomial SSI at the three tertiary hospitals.

Suggested Citation

  • Seke M. E. Kazuma & Chitalu Chanda & Bright Chirengendure & Joshua Chisanga & Stanley Zulu & Chalwe Mumba & Laulindah Shiku & Simba Kaja & Nachor Bunda & Emmanuel Makasa & Gershom Chongwe & Muleya Ina, 2026. "Burden of Nosocomial Surgical Site Infections at Three Tertiary Hospitals in Copperbelt Province, Zambia," European Journal of Clinical Medicine, European Open Science, vol. 7(3), pages 5-9, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:clinic:v:7:y:2026:i:3:id:70444
    DOI: 10.24018/clinicmed.2026.7.3.70444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/clinicmed/article/view/70444
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/clinicmed/article/download/70444/14527
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/clinicmed.2026.7.3.70444?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:clinic:v:7:y:2026:i:3:id:70444. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/clinicmed .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.