Author
Listed:
- Oluremi Olayinka Solomon
(Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria)
- Taiwo Hussean Raimi
(Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria)
- Olusola Peter Aduloju
(Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria)
Abstract
Patient satisfaction is a subjective and dynamic perception of the extent to which the patient’s expected healthcare needs are met. If the pregnant women are satisfied with the quality of service received, they will be willing to come back. The aim of this study is to explore the satisfaction of the pregnant women in Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital, Ado-Ekiti and their willingness to use the facility. The study was a qualitative design with 36 participants in 4 FGD in the antenatal clinic of a tertiary hospital to explore the factors enhancing their satisfaction and their willingness to come back to the hospital. During the discussions, note was taken and recorded with an android phone. Discussions were transcribed and analysed by themes manually. Many of the participants were satisfied with the services received in the hospital. The following were the reasons for their satisfaction; competency, confidentiality, health talk and respect by the health workers. Due to these factors, they were willing to come back to the hospital and to recommend to others. Some were dissatisfied because of the high cost, stress of moving from one pay point to another and lack of regular power supply and shortage of doctors at the radiology department. The factors associated with dissatisfaction are modifiable, and if they can be improved upon utilization rate will increase. We therefore recommend that cost should be reduced, harmonise the pay points, employ more doctors and ensure regular power supply in the radiology department.
Suggested Citation
Oluremi Olayinka Solomon & Taiwo Hussean Raimi & Olusola Peter Aduloju, 2025.
"Antenatal Care Satisfaction and Willingness to Come Back to the Hospital in Southwestern Nigeria: A Qualitative study,"
European Journal of Clinical Medicine, European Open Science, vol. 6(2), pages 1-5, May.
Handle:
RePEc:epw:clinic:v:6:y:2025:i:2:id:12374
DOI: 10.24018/clinicmed.2025.6.2.374
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:clinic:v:6:y:2025:i:2:id:12374. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/clinicmed .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.