IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/clinic/v5y2024i2id12301.html

Sustained Grasp Strength Characteristics What Changes with Skeletal Muscle Injuries

Author

Listed:
  • Elisabete Roldão

    (School of Health Sciences, Polytechnic of Leiria, Portugal)

  • Augusto Gil Pascoal

    (University of Lisbon, Portugal)

Abstract

Background: Grasping is present in most of the activities of daily living. The estimated total use of the hands in activities of daily living is more than five hours a day, not counting work and sports activities. The hand grasp strength peak is only relevant for short durations of applied forces, in the activities. The sustained strength gives a more realistic assessment of strength capabilities, during daily tasks. Objective: To characterize the sustained grasp strength over 5 seconds, in different grasps configurations, and identify changes in these when a musculoskeletal injury is present. Patients: Thirty right-handed participants, fifteen healthy (Control Group), and fifteen injured (Experimental Group) with musculoskeletal hand conditions, on the right side, 18 men and 12 women, were integrated into this study. In both groups, there were 9 men and 6 women. Methods: The Biometrics E-link® Dynamometer G200, was used, being kilograms as the measurement unit. The test position, to assess the hand grasp sustained strength, was recommended by the American Society of Hand Therapists. The strength was collected for 5 seconds, in the right hand, on eight grasp configurations, which can be performed on the dynamometer. Results: Men have more sustained strength than women, in all the grasp configurations assessed. The Experimental Group has inferior results regarding the peak strength, and the behavior of the strength is less stable. The man obtains the maximum endurance, and it is always over zero. The Inferior Pincer and the Parallel Extension are the grasp configurations that require less strength, being both precision grasps. The Medium Wrap is the grasp configuration that requires more strength, and it is also the one that has more differences between groups, regarding the strength and the peak strength. The three strongest grasps have the same configuration being the difference in the diameter of the grabbed object. Conclusion: The strength behavior for 5 seconds is similar between participants, with or without musculoskeletal conditions, being less high, less regular, and decreasing faster when there is an injury.

Suggested Citation

  • Elisabete Roldão & Augusto Gil Pascoal, 2024. "Sustained Grasp Strength Characteristics What Changes with Skeletal Muscle Injuries," European Journal of Clinical Medicine, European Open Science, vol. 5(2), pages 14-20, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:clinic:v:5:y:2024:i:2:id:12301
    DOI: 10.24018/clinicmed.2024.5.2.301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/clinicmed/article/view/12301
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/clinicmed/article/download/12301/2580
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/clinicmed.2024.5.2.301?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:clinic:v:5:y:2024:i:2:id:12301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/clinicmed .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.