IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/clinic/v4y2023i3id12252.html

Correlation between Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter and Marshall Scale in Acute Traumatic Brain Injury

Author

Listed:
  • Haider N. Al-Tameemi

    (University of Kufa, Iraq)

  • Sattar Al-Essawi

    (Middle Euphrates Neuroscience Center, Iraq)

  • Ali Alyassari

    (Middle Euphrates Neuroscience Center, Iraq)

Abstract

Background: Imaging plays integral role in the evaluation of patients with acute traumatic brain injury (TBI), with computerized tomography (CT) being the modality of the choice and the most commonly utilized imaging tool. One of the important determinants of TBI severity is raised intracranial pressure (ICP). Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) was considered as a reliable indirect surrogate for the raised ICP, however, studies assessing role of CT-derived ONSD in evaluation of patients with raised ICP or brain injury are limited. Aim of the study: To assess the correlation between ONSD measured by CT scan and the severity of TBI according to Marshall scale. Patients and methods: A cross-sectional analytic study was conducted on 60 adult patients (52 males, 8 females) presented with acute TBI and referred for brain CT examination. After initial general evaluation of brain CT images, the score of TBI was assessed according to Marshal's scale (I to VI). The transverse ONSD was manually measured on axial CT image at 3 mm distance behind eye globe. The correlation between the grade of TBI and ONSD was subjected to statistical analysis. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Review Committee. Results: The means of all, right-sided and left-sided ONSD were 4.695 mm, 4.606 mm and 4.785 mm respectively. There was positive, linear and statistically significant correlation (p value

Suggested Citation

  • Haider N. Al-Tameemi & Sattar Al-Essawi & Ali Alyassari, 2023. "Correlation between Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter and Marshall Scale in Acute Traumatic Brain Injury," European Journal of Clinical Medicine, European Open Science, vol. 4(3), pages 1-4, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:clinic:v:4:y:2023:i:3:id:12252
    DOI: 10.24018/clinicmed.2023.4.3.252
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/clinicmed/article/view/12252
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/clinicmed/article/download/12252/2510
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/clinicmed.2023.4.3.252?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:clinic:v:4:y:2023:i:3:id:12252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/clinicmed .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.