Author
Listed:
- Balantine U. Eze
(Enugu State University of Science and Technology, Nigeria)
- Nkiruka N. Okoloagu
(Enugu State University of Science and Technology, Nigeria)
- Sunday G. Mba
(Enugu State University of Science and Technology, Nigeria)
Abstract
Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is a reliable, objective and reproducible method of summative assessment of clinical competence. The aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability of OSCE for summative evaluation of final year medical students in both Internal Medicine and Surgery. This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of summative assessment of final-year medical students in Internal Medicine and Surgery at College of Medicine, Enugu State University of Science and Technology. The students’ clinical competence was tested by OSCE. The OSCE consisted of two parts. The A part (picture OSCE, replacing traditional short cases) in which questions were given to students from slide shows. The B part (clinical OSCE, replacing traditional long case) consisted of clinical OSCE stations to test students’ ability and skills in history taking, physical examination, counselling/communication skills, ability to make diagnosis, interpretation of laboratory/radiological results and ability to manage common medical emergencies and conditions. The students' scores in the picture OSCE, clinical OSCE, and final total clinical score scores in both Internal Medicine and Surgery were collated and subjected to analysis with SPSS version 25 (IBM; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Correlation was assessed by Pearson correlation, mean scores compared with paired t-test, reliability assessed by calculating Cronbach's alpha. Statistical significance was considered as p
Suggested Citation
Balantine U. Eze & Nkiruka N. Okoloagu & Sunday G. Mba, 2022.
"Objective Structured Clinical Examination as A Reliable tool in the Summative Evaluation of Final Year Medical Students at Enugu State University College of Medicine,"
European Journal of Clinical Medicine, European Open Science, vol. 3(6), pages 1-3, October.
Handle:
RePEc:epw:clinic:v:3:y:2022:i:6:id:12236
DOI: 10.24018/clinicmed.2022.3.6.236
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:clinic:v:3:y:2022:i:6:id:12236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/clinicmed .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.