IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/clinic/v2y2021i6id12134.html

Low-Cost Drugs Still Relevant in the Present-Day Era

Author

Listed:
  • Subhashchandra Daga

    (B.J. Medical College and Sassoon General Hospital, India)

Abstract

Escalating medical costs contribute to poverty in countries with low resources. The drug costs account for 17 percent of medical expenses. Revisiting time-tested, cost-effective drugs can reduce these costs. Some of them find a place in the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines for Children. The list consists of medicines for a basic healthcare system. They are safe and cost-effective. The present paper identifies co-trimoxazole and chloramphenicol as antimicrobials, chloroquine for malaria, adrenaline, theophylline for asthma, and phenobarbital as an anti-epileptic drug that merits consideration for reviving interest in them and reduce drug treatment costs. What is already known about this subject? • The cost of drugs contributes to rising medical costs. • Medical expenses push a large population below the poverty line. What does this study add? • Rediscovering the relevance of old low-cost drugs is essential. • Revisiting the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines for Children may be useful. • Drugs such as chloramphenicol and theophylline are such examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Subhashchandra Daga, 2021. "Low-Cost Drugs Still Relevant in the Present-Day Era," European Journal of Clinical Medicine, European Open Science, vol. 2(6), pages 10-12, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:clinic:v:2:y:2021:i:6:id:12134
    DOI: 10.24018/clinicmed.2021.2.6.134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/clinicmed/article/view/12134
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/clinicmed/article/download/12134/2438
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/clinicmed.2021.2.6.134?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:clinic:v:2:y:2021:i:6:id:12134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/clinicmed .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.