Author
Listed:
- Faiza Saeed
(The Indus Hospital, Pakistan)
- Ashar Alam
(The Indus Hospital, Pakistan)
- Shoukat Memon
(The Indus Hospital, Pakistan)
- Salman Imtiaz
(The Indus Hospital, Pakistan)
Abstract
Introduction: The patients with end stage renal disease requires 12 hours of hemodialysis per week divided in three equal sessions (4 hours/day for 3 days/week). Some studies show that adequacy of hemodialysis can be maintained by increasing the surface area of the dialyzer membrane and decreasing the frequency of treatment which can help the poor socioeconomic status patients in getting effective hemodialysis at a low cost. Objectives: To observe whether by increasing the surface area of dialyzer the dose of dialysis can be reduced against the standard hemodialysis prescription. Study design: Randomized Control Trial. Study Duration: Six months from March 2017 to August 2017. Settings: Department of Nephrology, The Indus Hospital Karachi. Subjects: ESRD patients undergoing Hemodialysis for at least 6 months at The Indus Hospital Karachi. Methods: In this prospective randomized control study, a total of 60 patients of end stage renal disease receiving hemodialysis for more than six months were included and divided into 2 groups randomly (Arm-A: twice weekly dialysis using a larger surface area dialyzer and Arm-:B thrice weekly dialysis using regular surface area dialyzer). Results: A total of 59 (30 in Arm A and 29 in Arm B) patients were enrolled in the study out of which majority of the patients were male (59.3%). On average significantly higher URR and eKt/V were reported in Arm A whereas, higher mean standard (weekly) stdKt/V was reported in Arm-B. Conclusion: Standard protocols should be followed to maintain the adequacy of Hemodialysis.
Suggested Citation
Faiza Saeed & Ashar Alam & Shoukat Memon & Salman Imtiaz, 2021.
"The Effect of Increasing Surface Area of Dialyzer Membrane on Adequacy of Hemodialysis,"
European Journal of Clinical Medicine, European Open Science, vol. 2(6), pages 19-23, November.
Handle:
RePEc:epw:clinic:v:2:y:2021:i:6:id:12130
DOI: 10.24018/clinicmed.2021.2.6.130
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:clinic:v:2:y:2021:i:6:id:12130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/clinicmed .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.