IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/clinic/v2y2021i5id12128.html

Quality of Life Score Difference Based on Chronic Otitis Media Outcome Test-15 (COMOT-15) Questionnaire on Chronic Supurative Otitis Media Patients with and without Cholesteatoma at Sanglah General Hospital

Author

Listed:
  • E. P. Setiawan

    (Sanglah General Hospital, Indonesia)

  • M. R. R. D. Meregawa

    (Sanglah General Hospital, Indonesia)

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) is a chronic infection in the middle ear with perforation of the tympanic membrane and persistent or intermittent secretion from the middle ear which is more than two months. It causes a pathological condition in the ear which results in limited hearing function in a person and will affect the quality of life of the patients. Quality of life assessment is carried out to assess the patient's condition and an instrument is needed to be able to evaluate the condition of CSOM patients. Currently, there are several questionnaires that can be used to assess the quality of life of people with CSOM. One of them is the Chronic Otitis Media Outcome Test (COMOT-15) which is a valid measuring tool to subjectively assess the quality of life of people with CSOM. Methods: This study was an observational study with a cross sectional study design. Results: There was a difference in quality-of-life scores between CSOM patients with and without cholesteatoma types with mean score 26.87 (95% CI 22.28- 31.47) (p

Suggested Citation

  • E. P. Setiawan & M. R. R. D. Meregawa, 2021. "Quality of Life Score Difference Based on Chronic Otitis Media Outcome Test-15 (COMOT-15) Questionnaire on Chronic Supurative Otitis Media Patients with and without Cholesteatoma at Sanglah General Hospital," European Journal of Clinical Medicine, European Open Science, vol. 2(5), pages 14-18, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:epw:clinic:v:2:y:2021:i:5:id:12128
    DOI: 10.24018/clinicmed.2021.2.5.128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/clinicmed/article/view/12128
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/clinicmed/article/download/12128/2421
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/clinicmed.2021.2.5.128?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:clinic:v:2:y:2021:i:5:id:12128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/clinicmed .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.