IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/clinic/v2y2021i3id12081.html

Assessment of Immunoreactivity against Therapeutic Options Employing the Leukocyte Adherence Inhibition Test as a Tool for Precision Medicine

Author

Listed:
  • Celso Eduardo Olivier

    (Instituto Alergoimuno de Americana (Americana's Alergoimuno Institute), Brazil)

  • Daiana Guedes Pinto

    (Instituto Alergoimuno de Americana (Americana’s Alergoimuno Institute), Brazil)

  • Regiane Patussi dos Santos Lima

    (Instituto Alergoimuno de Americana (Americana’s Alergoimuno Institute), Brazil)

  • Mariana Dias da Silva

    (Instituto Alergoimuno de Americana (Americana’s Alergoimuno Institute), Brazil)

  • Raquel Acácia Pereira Gonçalves dos Santos

    (Instituto Alergoimuno de Americana (Americana’s Alergoimuno Institute), Brazil)

  • Ana Paula Monezzi Teixeira

    (Faculdade de Americana, Brazil)

  • Patricia Ucelli Simioni

    (Faculdade de Americana, Brazil)

Abstract

Background: The Precision Medicine’s approach employs the endotype concept as a central feature to personalize medical treatment. Individual immunoreactivity, alongside characteristics such as genetics, environment, and diet, is one of the factors that differentiates the therapeutic-driven endotypes. Objective: To evaluate the opportunity of the Leukocyte Adherence Inhibition test to differentiate the immunoreactivity between two similar therapeutic agents employed on Allergen Immunotherapy. Methods: Side by side Leukocyte Adherence Inhibitions tests were performed with ovalbumin and carbamylated ovalbumin on a population of 33 self-reported egg-allergic individuals. Results: The results showed two endotypes inside the immune response of the studied groups: The first endotype was defined by the 16 individuals that presented a significant decrease in ovalbumin’s immunoreactivity after carbamylation (mean of differences = 35%; p = 0.002). The second endotype was defined by 17 individuals that presented a significant increase in ovalbumin’s immunoreactivity after carbamylation (mean of differences = 32%; p = 0.001). Conclusion: The Leukocyte Adherence Inhibition test was able to differentiate two distinct immunoreactivity patterns when comparing two similar therapeutic agents suggesting, as proof of concept, a potential role to be employed as a Precision Medicine tool.

Suggested Citation

  • Celso Eduardo Olivier & Daiana Guedes Pinto & Regiane Patussi dos Santos Lima & Mariana Dias da Silva & Raquel Acácia Pereira Gonçalves dos Santos & Ana Paula Monezzi Teixeira & Patricia Ucelli Simion, 2021. "Assessment of Immunoreactivity against Therapeutic Options Employing the Leukocyte Adherence Inhibition Test as a Tool for Precision Medicine," European Journal of Clinical Medicine, European Open Science, vol. 2(3), pages 40-45, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:clinic:v:2:y:2021:i:3:id:12081
    DOI: 10.24018/clinicmed.2021.2.3.81
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/clinicmed/article/view/12081
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/clinicmed/article/download/12081/2387
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/clinicmed.2021.2.3.81?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:clinic:v:2:y:2021:i:3:id:12081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/clinicmed .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.