IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/arch00/v1y2022i2id603.html

PLUS GreeN: Reconciling Urban Streams and Greenways through Placemaking

Author

Listed:
  • Archana Sharma

Abstract

Design and planning regarding urban streams are mostly viewed through the lens of ecological restoration the federal and state agencies. Cities and counties, undertaking the greenway and green network planning exercises mostly consider the urban streams as a sub-context, to be dealt with at a later stage or by different agencies. The middle ground between the urban streams, and urban greenways, thus often remains un-tended, and shows up as fragmented urban mosaic. Placemaking is often discussed in design and planning of architecture and landscape of urban built environment, to create a pause or interest or a place of rest for people. This paper considers placemaking as a landscape design approach to address the middle ground and reconcile the two ecologies of urban streams and greenways. A focused case research of an urban stream in northeast Baltimore is undertaken based on classic method of site-context analyses, federal, state, and local guides on stream restoration are considered and opportunities of bridging the connection are envisioned through conceptual design resolutions, underscored by the agenda of placemaking. As further research, the disconnect between various natural resources such as urban streams and urban greenways should be addressed through policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Archana Sharma, 2022. "PLUS GreeN: Reconciling Urban Streams and Greenways through Placemaking," European Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning, European Open Science Publishing, vol. 1(2), pages 1-11, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:arch00:v:1:y:2022:i:2:id:603
    DOI: 10.24018/ejarch.2022.1.2.3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/arch/article/view/603
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/arch/article/download/603/227
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejarch.2022.1.2.3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William C. Sullivan & Chun-Yen Chang, 2017. "Landscapes and Human Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-2, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tsung-Ming Tsao & Jing-Shiang Hwang & Sung-Tsun Lin & Charlene Wu & Ming-Jer Tsai & Ta-Chen Su, 2022. "Forest Bathing Is Better than Walking in Urban Park: Comparison of Cardiac and Vascular Function between Urban and Forest Parks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Siqi Lai & Yifan Zhu & Brian Deal, 2023. "Did COVID-19 Reshape Visitor Preferences in Urban Parks? Investigating Influences on Sentiments in Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-16, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:arch00:v:1:y:2022:i:2:id:603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/arch .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.