IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

ORGANIZATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS AND METHODOLOGICAL COMPETENCES. Are there differences within methodological competences needed for thinking and used for work method and style based on the characteristics of the organization?

Listed author(s):
  • Lajos SZABÓ

    (University of Pannonia, Veszprém, Hungary)

  • Anikó CSEPREGI

    (University of Pannonia, Veszprém, Hungary)

An empirical survey, which has been conducted since 2007 in Hungary, has aimed to investigate middle managers working at mediumand large-sized enterprises in Hungary by a questionnaire. One part of the survey answers have been analysed by using Principal Component Analysis and seven different components regarding competence groups found important for knowledge sharing have been identified. After revealing these competence groups our research has aimed to investigate whether there are differences within selected competence groups (methodological competences needed for thinking and methodological competences used for work method and style) regarding the characteristics of the middle manager’s organization. The results have shown that only regarding one of the examined competence group (methodological competences used for work method and style) there has been difference based on the investigated organizational characteristics.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Economic Publishing House in its journal Management & Marketing.

Volume (Year): 8 (2013)
Issue (Month): Special-Issue (October)
Pages: 353-362

in new window

Handle: RePEc:eph:journl:v:8:y:2013:i:special-issue:p:353-362
Contact details of provider:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eph:journl:v:8:y:2013:i:special-issue:p:353-362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Simona Vasilache)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.