IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eph/journl/v8y2013ispecial-issuep353-362.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ORGANIZATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS AND METHODOLOGICAL COMPETENCES. Are there differences within methodological competences needed for thinking and used for work method and style based on the characteristics of the organization?

Author

Listed:
  • Lajos SZABÓ

    (University of Pannonia, Veszprém, Hungary)

  • Anikó CSEPREGI

    (University of Pannonia, Veszprém, Hungary)

Abstract

An empirical survey, which has been conducted since 2007 in Hungary, has aimed to investigate middle managers working at mediumand large-sized enterprises in Hungary by a questionnaire. One part of the survey answers have been analysed by using Principal Component Analysis and seven different components regarding competence groups found important for knowledge sharing have been identified. After revealing these competence groups our research has aimed to investigate whether there are differences within selected competence groups (methodological competences needed for thinking and methodological competences used for work method and style) regarding the characteristics of the middle manager’s organization. The results have shown that only regarding one of the examined competence group (methodological competences used for work method and style) there has been difference based on the investigated organizational characteristics.

Suggested Citation

  • Lajos SZABÓ & Anikó CSEPREGI, 2013. "ORGANIZATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS AND METHODOLOGICAL COMPETENCES. Are there differences within methodological competences needed for thinking and used for work method and style based on the characteristi," Management & Marketing, Economic Publishing House, vol. 8(Special-I), pages 353-362, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:eph:journl:v:8:y:2013:i:special-issue:p:353-362
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.managementmarketing.ro/~store/suplimente/2013-International_Conference_on_Business_Excellence.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eph:journl:v:8:y:2013:i:special-issue:p:353-362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Simona Vasilache (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.