IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Project Values From Team Members’ Point Of View

Listed author(s):
  • Marius RADU

    (Babeş-Bolyai University of Cluj-Napoca)

  • Ioana MUREŞAN

    (Babeş-Bolyai University of Cluj-Napoca)

  • Răzvan NISTOR

    (Babeş-Bolyai University of Cluj-Napoca)

Registered author(s):

    The value of a project can have multiple significances and it can be assessed in a relation with the project stakeholders’ perceptions, assumptions and expectations. When considering a project, the company is usually interested in economic value. This value can be assessed isolated - the outcomes of the project as a black box or it can be assessed in a context - project as a strategic piece of a portfolio, aligned with the company mission. In the current study we used the conjoint analysis with a choicebased approach to assess the value of IT projects as it is perceived by the project team members - 'engine' stakeholders when dealing with projects. Also this paper illustrates how the choice experiments method can be used to assess the project value perceived by team members or other project stakeholders, as the project manager, senior management or product owner.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://www.managementmarketing.ro/~store/suplimente/2013-International_Conference_on_Business_Excellence.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Economic Publishing House in its journal Management & Marketing.

    Volume (Year): 8 (2013)
    Issue (Month): Special-Issue (October)
    Pages: 317-326

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eph:journl:v:8:y:2013:i:special-issue:p:317-326
    Contact details of provider:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eph:journl:v:8:y:2013:i:special-issue:p:317-326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Simona Vasilache)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.