IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article


Listed author(s):
  • Alexandra Mihaela POPESCU

    (Bucharest Univeristy of Economic Studies)

  • Alecxandrina DEACONU

    (Bucharest Univeristy of Economic Studies)

Registered author(s):

    Finding new solutions that point out existing human potential in SMEs is an important element in reviving the national economy. Featured by diminished personnel, high flexibility and the possibility of a fast answer to external factors development, SMEs are based on human agent and on informal relations between organization’s members, Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) being an important competitive advantage. Our study is a compared analysis of the Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) at Romanian SMEs level, analysis achieved at the Romanian Development Regions level between December 2012 – August 2013 on a 560 representative sample of SMEs. Data obtained by our socioeconomical investigation based on a questionnaire, were processed with Microsoft Excel Software. The results highlighted approach differences at managerial level concerning informal relations in organizations, these being one of the causes of performance differences between SMEs performances at Romanian Development Regions level. Measuring Organizational Citizenship Behavior level and discussing the causes that influence it, highlight that performances are not exclusively based on investments but also on another approach of the connections Manager-employees

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Economic Publishing House in its journal Management & Marketing.

    Volume (Year): 8 (2013)
    Issue (Month): Special-Issue (October)
    Pages: 291-300

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eph:journl:v:8:y:2013:i:special-issue:p:291-300
    Contact details of provider:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eph:journl:v:8:y:2013:i:special-issue:p:291-300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Simona Vasilache)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.