IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Corruption and bribery assessment – econometrics algorithms and perception index

Listed author(s):
  • Elena Monica SABĂU

    (Romanian Academy, Iași, Romania)

Registered author(s):

    Processes assessing the audit risk or fraud risk at company level, call on professional judgment and experience of auditors or antifraud managers considering as risk assessment procedure, the concentric circles technique, in assessing national economic environment, the industry and then the internal environment of the company. If for assessing risks in the industry we refer to the specific regulations and business practices and for reporting and internal environment of the organization, there is a wide range of internal control protocols that are verified and validated, for the national economic environment issues become more complicated. Most audit companies are using the perception indexes issued by Transparency International and World Bank Institute. This paper shows the limits of those indexes and presents an advanced econometric analysis for corruption level assessment. The paper demonstrates that using factor analysis by auditors becomes an instrument of major importance in determining accurate audit risk or fraud risk associated with national economic context.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://www.managementmarketing.ro/pdf/articole/310.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Economic Publishing House in its journal Management & Marketing.

    Volume (Year): 8 (2013)
    Issue (Month): 1 (Spring)
    Pages:

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eph:journl:v:8:y:2013:i:1:n:13
    Contact details of provider:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eph:journl:v:8:y:2013:i:1:n:13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Simona Vasilache)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.