IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

The search experience credence product classification paradigm in the eyes of the electronic consumer

Listed author(s):
  • Delia Sorana VARVARA MITYKO

    (“Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University)

The literature review reveals numerous product classification models, the Search Experience Credence being one of them. Product categorization plays a major role in a company’s marketing strategy and product characteristics can determine whether a product will be as successful online as it is in the traditional physical store. This paper presents the results of a survey conducted on consumers’ perceptions of electronic commerce, the products being sold online and their categorization as either Search Experience Credence type. Using the data collected from 273 consumers, the intent is to examine if there are any correlations between demographic parameters and the way consumers perceive the products. In this regard the study’s results show some significant differences between factors influencing the perception of a certain product type. Moreover, the study aims at examining whether online experience or frequency of shopping influences the way the customer perceive products on the online platform and a shift from credence to experience over to search can be induced by increasing the number of online purchases. Implications of the results are discussed.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Economic Publishing House in its journal Management & Marketing.

Volume (Year): 7 (2012)
Issue (Month): 3 (Autumn)

in new window

Handle: RePEc:eph:journl:v:7:y:2012:i:3:n:5
Contact details of provider:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eph:journl:v:7:y:2012:i:3:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Simona Vasilache)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.