IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Senior year high school pupils’ segmentation based on the benefits and costs considered in decesion making process of educational choices

  • Mihai-Florin BĂCILĂ

    (Babeş-Bolyai University of Cluj-Napoca)

Attracting financial resources is an important issue for universities. Because for universities is impossible to cover from state budget the whole costs of education, the importance of attracting students has increased. As the pupils’ needs and wishes are heterogeneous, in order to better understand the decision making process, universities must divide the educational market in smaller homogeneous segments. Although the segmentation concept and the decision making process of educational choices are widely approached in literature, articles on the pupils' segmentation are very scarce. The present market segmentation was carried out based on the level of importance of various benefits and costs to pupils when they decide whether to enroll in a higher education institution. The considered benefits are the possibility of meeting new people, development of knowledge from high school, getting a bachelor's degree, acquiring knowledge and skills required for employment, development of general culture and the student life. The considered costs are submission fee, tuition fee, time to study, mental effort to learn, long term before graduation and reducing time for hobbies. The method used for segmentation is the K-mean cluster analysis. To assess the internal cohesion of the cluster we determined the average sum of squares error while to determine the differences among the clusters were used ANOVA and posthoc Tukey tests. The results enable university managers to better understand pupils' needs and to conceive marketing strategies for attracting and recruiting students.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.managementmarketing.ro/pdf/articole/282.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Economic Publishing House in its journal Management & Marketing.

Volume (Year): 7 (2012)
Issue (Month): 3 (Autumn)
Pages:

as
in new window

Handle: RePEc:eph:journl:v:7:y:2012:i:3:n:10
Contact details of provider:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eph:journl:v:7:y:2012:i:3:n:10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Simona Vasilache)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.