Knowledge transfer in medical education from a teamwork perspective
The factors of knowledge transfer through teamwork in hospitals from developing medical systems have not been thoroughly studied. We explored physicians’ assessment of knowledge sharing in teams in order to better define and understand these factors. We questioned 1615 physicians in 323 clinics, who returned 898 valid questionnaires. The physicians were asked to reflect on their learning experiences, as members in various teams, and on the value of these situations for their overall learning outcomes. We have used principal component analysis and OLS regression to outline the relations between the perceived quality of overall learning outcomes and the learning situations encountered in teamwork. We have obtained a model of teamwork learning, to which stability is central: a constant group of physicians, alternating in teams. The learning opportunities in the clinic include learning from one’s own errors, learning from colleagues (role models), learning from patients, learning from case discussions, learning from clinical report discussions. Some are retained and some others are dropped, based on the physicians’ attitude to them. While learning from one’s own errors is preferred, role models seem to be rather controversial. Physicians’ own judgments and evaluations of learning sources influence team knowledge transfer and its perceived quality.
Volume (Year): 7 (2012)
Issue (Month): 3 (Autumn)
|Contact details of provider:|| |
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eph:journl:v:7:y:2012:i:3:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Simona Vasilache)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.