IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eph/journl/v5y2010i3n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CEE corporate finance peculiarities: comparative approach in relation with developed countries

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina Maria TRIANDAFIL

    (Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Petre BREZEANU

    (Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

In order to reveal the corporate finance peculiarities, we conduct a panel data study on companies located in European emerging (Czech, Poland, Slovakia, Hungary and Romania) and developed countries (United Kingdom, France, Spain, Italy and Germany). We identify specific elements at country level which strengthen the assumptions of heterogeneity at the level of corporate finance. We reveal that both firm specific and common factors have an impact on corporations; nevertheless, comparative to similar works, the degree of heterogeneity is lower, confirming the theories of CEE intercountry high correlation.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina Maria TRIANDAFIL & Petre BREZEANU, 2010. "CEE corporate finance peculiarities: comparative approach in relation with developed countries," Management & Marketing, Economic Publishing House, vol. 5(3), Autumn.
    • Handle: RePEc:eph:journl:v:5:y:2010:i:3:n:5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.managementmarketing.ro/pdf/articole/195.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Morar Triandafil, Cristina & Poanta, Dorina, 2011. "Central and East European Corporate Finance: Between Commonality and Heterogeneity," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(3), pages 132-161, September.
    2. Dejan Malinić & Ksenija DenÄ ić-Mihajlov & Ema Ljubenović, 2013. "The Determinants of Capital Structure in Emerging Capital Markets: Evidence from Serbia," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 98-119.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eph:journl:v:5:y:2010:i:3:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Simona Vasilache (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.