Possible errors in establishing the sample dimensions of survey investigations
Starting from the „rough” use of 1,500-1,800 subject samples in field researches with populations of the dimensions of a medium town, a capital or an entire country, which generates doubts and possible questions related to the representativeness of the investigated samples as well as to the conclusions of these researches, we developed the reconstruction of the necessary interactions in determining the sample volume, and also identified some inadvertencies. Some improvements solutions were also recommended.
Volume (Year): 5 (2010)
Issue (Month): 1 (Spring)
|Contact details of provider:|| |
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eph:journl:v:5:y:2010:i:1:n:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Simona Vasilache)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.