IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epc/journl/v5y2010i1p34-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preferences for privacy and security: An experimental investigation

Author

Listed:
  • C. Jill Stowe

    () (Department of Economics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA)

  • Kate Krause

    (Department of Economics, University of New Mexico in Albuquerque, NM, USA)

  • Janie M. Chermak

    (Department of Economics, University of New Mexico in Albuquerque, NM, USA)

Abstract

The article experimentally investigates individuals’ choice behavior between privacy and security. In a convenience sample of undergraduate and graduate students, we find that most individuals choose to sacrifice a moderate amount of privacy in exchange for a moderate increase in security. A nontrivial fraction of participants made more extreme choices, opting for either high security or high privacy positions. Identifiable factors influenced these choices. For example, while the high security individuals responded to losses they personally experienced in the experiment, high privacy subjects responded to losses experienced by others in the experiment.

Suggested Citation

  • C. Jill Stowe & Kate Krause & Janie M. Chermak, 2010. "Preferences for privacy and security: An experimental investigation," Economics of Peace and Security Journal, EPS Publishing, vol. 5(1), pages 34-42, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:epc:journl:v:5:y:2010:i:1:p:34-42
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.epsjournal.org.uk/index.php/EPSJ/article/view/109
    Download Restriction: Open access 24 months after original publication.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Privacy; security; multinomial logit;

    JEL classification:

    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • C92 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Group Behavior

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epc:journl:v:5:y:2010:i:1:p:34-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael Brown, Managing Editor, EPSJ). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ecaarea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.