IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epc/journl/v10y2015i1p54-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Farmer-Pastoralist Violence on Income: New Survey Evidence from Nigeria’s Middle Belt States

Author

Listed:
  • Topher L. McDougal

    () (Joan B. Kroc School of Peace Studies, University of San Diego, California, USA)

  • Talia Hagerty

    () (Research Fellow, Institute for Economics and Peace, Sydney, Australia)

  • Lisa Inks

    () (Director, Conflict Management Programs, Mercy Corps, Nigeria)

  • Claire-Lorentz Ugo-Ike

    () (Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning Advisor, Mercy Corps, Nigeria)

  • Caitriona Dowd

    () (Research Fellow, Mercy Corps, Nigeria)

  • Stone Conroy

    () (Conflict Management and Economic Development Fellow, Mercy Corps, Nigeria)

  • Daniel Ogabiela

    () (Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning Officer, Mercy Corps, Nigeria)

Abstract

This study estimates the relationship between violent conflict and household income in four states of Nigeria’s Middle Belt region (Benue, Kaduna, Nasarawa, and Plateau) where farmers and pastoralists routinely clash over access to farmland, grazing areas, stock routes, and water points for animals and households. Although relatively low in intensity, this form of violence is widespread, persistent, and arguably increasing in its incidence. We obtained data on income and household-level violence exposure from an original household survey administered in September 2014. Employing a negative binomial instrumental variables model, we find an inverse relation between violence and household incomes. Incomes could be increased by between 64 to 210 percent of current levels if violence related to farmer-pastoralist conflict in the four study states were reduced to near-zero. Cumulatively, we find that forgone income represents 10.2 percent of the combined official state domestic product in the study area. This is high when compared to the costs of conflict measured in other studies, even as our study takes account only of microeconomic costs. After incorporating an estimate of the size of the informal economy, the microeconomic cost of farmer-pastoralist conflict to the total economy is approximately 2.9 percent.

Suggested Citation

  • Topher L. McDougal & Talia Hagerty & Lisa Inks & Claire-Lorentz Ugo-Ike & Caitriona Dowd & Stone Conroy & Daniel Ogabiela, 2015. "The Effect of Farmer-Pastoralist Violence on Income: New Survey Evidence from Nigeria’s Middle Belt States," Economics of Peace and Security Journal, EPS Publishing, vol. 10(1), pages 54-65, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:epc:journl:v:10:y:2015:i:1:p:54-65
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.epsjournal.org.uk/index.php/EPSJ/article/view/213
    Download Restriction: Open access 12 months after original publication. Reader registration required.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Farmer-pastoralist violence; cost of conflict; survey; instrumental variables; negative binomial model;

    JEL classification:

    • C36 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Instrumental Variables (IV) Estimation
    • D74 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances; Revolutions
    • J17 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Value of Life; Foregone Income

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epc:journl:v:10:y:2015:i:1:p:54-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jurgen Brauer, Editor, EPSJ). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ecaarea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.