IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eom/eajstr/a33.html

Conceptualising Rural Women Empowerment

Author

Listed:
  • Pauline Nelima Liru

Abstract

Rural women empowerment is a central objective of social inclusion initiatives across the Global South, yet outcomes remain uneven and conceptually contested. Participation in collective platforms such as self-help groups and cooperatives is frequently equated with empowerment, obscuring the relational processes through which inclusion is produced, mediated, and constrained. This study addresses this gap by applying Social Network Theory, focusing specifically on the tenet of social ties, to examine how relational configurations shape social inclusion outcomes in rural women empowerment initiatives. Using a theory-driven qualitative relational synthesis, the study analyses fifteen peer-reviewed empirical studies from rural contexts in Asia and Africa. Treating case studies as sources of relational evidence, the analysis traces how bonding ties, bridging ties, and their interaction with local power relations function as mechanisms influencing access, participation, and agency. The findings show that empowerment is not a direct outcome of participation but a contingent process filtered through the balance and governance of social ties. The study advances a relational explanation for persistent heterogeneity in empowerment outcomes and calls for approaches that move beyond participation metrics.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:eom:eajstr:a:33
DOI: 10.66699/zwbxhk98
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://doi.org/10.66699/zwbxhk98
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.66699/zwbxhk98?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eom:eajstr:a:33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: HRL Journal Service (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eastafricajournal.org/index.php/eajstr .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.