IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

¿Son compatibles los ideales científicos con los intereses personales? Una aplicación de la teoría de juegos

  • Juan Carlos García-Bermejo Ochoa

    (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid)

Registered author(s):

    Is the reward system efficient to achieve that scientists take the research decisions that contribute most to the epistemic growth of their discipline? This paper approaches this question with regard to a wide class of games. By means of some very simple examples, it shows how easily it may happen that incentives get distorted, even if all members of the scientific community share a common epistemic point of view, every obtained result is published, there are not redundant results, contributions are evaluated by direct inspection, and scientists are rewarded according to their relative performance.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://codex.colmex.mx:8991/exlibris/aleph/a18_1/apache_media/NL748SL8XDCS7FHHIPXFT4PA8F87L2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Económicos in its journal Estudios Económicos.

    Volume (Year): 16 (2001)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 3-56

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:emx:esteco:v:16:y:2001:i:1:p:3-56
    Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.colmex.mx/centros/cee/

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:emx:esteco:v:16:y:2001:i:1:p:3-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Rocío Contreras)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.