Customs Union and Competitiveness of Turkish Exports in the EU Market: A Dynamic Shift-Share Analysis
When Turkey signed the Customs Union (CU) agreement with the EU in 1996 there were doubts about the costs and benefits of the CU with regards to Turkey’s foreign trade and industrial production. Theoretically, the CU helps improve efficiency by stimulating productivity gains in the tradable sectors and via technological gains due to spillover effects. It is of utmost interest to examine whether such expectations were materialized for Turkey. This article examines the changes in major Turkish exports destined to the EU market and determinants of competitiveness using dynamic shift-share analysis for the period 1987–2006. In this method, the competitiveness of Turkish products is examined vis-à-vis her competitors in the EU market. The results of the dynamic shift-share analysis show that Turkey’s competitive position has only partially improved. The results demonstrate that Turkey’s competitive position improved in textiles, iron and steel and automotive exports, and deteriorated in technologically more advanced manufacturing exports. The major determinants of this competitive position are found not to be price-related factors but “real” factors, such as productivity. The article concludes that potential benefits from a customs union have not yet materialized for major Turkish exports.
Volume (Year): 3 (2011)
Issue (Month): 2 (May)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Emerging Markets Forum 2600 Virginia Ave, NW, Ste 201 Washington, DC 20037|
Web page: http://www.emergingmarketsforum.org/
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:||Web: http://eme.sagepub.com|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:emf:journl:2011b-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Natasha Mukherjee)The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Natasha Mukherjee to update the entry or send us the correct email address
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.