IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/techsp/techs-06-2026-0146.html

Aligning artificial intelligence applications with enterprise sustainability objectives: a QFD-Based decision-making framework

Author

Listed:
  • Shuki Dror

Abstract

PurposeThis study develops a systematic methodology for identifying and prioritizing artificial intelligence (AI) applications according to enterprise sustainability improvement needs.Design/methodology/approachA quality function deployment (QFD)-based framework links organization-specific sustainability objectives (WHATs) with relevant AI applications (HOWs). Prioritization is based on normalized improvement scores at two hierarchical levels—sustainability objectives and AI applications—using the mean square error (MSE) criterion. The framework also incorporates synergies among AI applications. A supplementary analysis assesses implementation barriers across different manufacturing stages. The methodology was applied in a chemical processing company using expert assessments from a multidisciplinary QFD process.FindingsSeven sustainability objectives and seven AI applications were evaluated. Greenhouse gas reduction emerged as the highest-priority sustainability objective. Multi-objective optimization platforms, AI-based predictive maintenance, and predictive process optimization received the highest AI-application priorities. The resulting rankings reflect the cumulative relationships between sustainability objectives and AI applications, organization-specific sustainability improvement priorities, and cross-application synergies. The supplementary analysis identified technological, operational, and organizational barriers that may affect AI implementation.Research limitations/implicationsThe results reflect organization-specific expert judgments and should not be interpreted as population-level estimates. Future research may examine inter-expert agreement, sensitivity, and post-implementation sustainability outcomes using larger expert panels and additional organizational settings.Practical implicationsThe framework provides managers with a structured decision-support process for prioritizing AI applications and informing resource allocation and implementation planning.Originality/valueThis study extends and operationalizes an established QFD-based decision architecture for enterprise sustainability by linking organization-specific sustainability improvement priorities to AI applications and their synergies.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuki Dror, 2026. "Aligning artificial intelligence applications with enterprise sustainability objectives: a QFD-Based decision-making framework," Technological Sustainability, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 5(4), pages 397-414, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:techsp:techs-06-2026-0146
    DOI: 10.1108/TECHS-06-2026-0146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/techs/article/5/4/397/1401519/Aligning-artificial-intelligence-applications-with
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/techs/article-pdf/5/4/397/11902309/techs-06-2026-0146en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/TECHS-06-2026-0146?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:techsp:techs-06-2026-0146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.