Author
Listed:
- David J. Burns
- Pola B. Gupta
- Steven D. Burns
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this study is to explore the effects of different types of collegiate education by examining collegiate business students' sentiment toward marketing. Design/methodology/approach - Students attending marketing classes at two universities (a Jesuit university and a state university) in the same region in the USA were sampled. The questionnaires included the Index of Consumer Sentiment toward Marketing (ICSM). Findings - For overall sentiment toward marketing and for each of the aspects of marketing, significant (at the 0.05 level) differences are noted. In each instance, students attending the state university report more positive sentiment toward marketing than students attending the Jesuit university. Research limitations/implications - The sample is comprised of students attending only two universities located in the same region. Practical implications - The findings suggest that students attending Jesuit universities may possess more negative sentiment toward marketing than students attending the state university. The increased emphasis on social justice and social responsibility at the Jesuit university may increase the standards with which their students evaluate marketers. Business students from Jesuit universities may be more likely to act socially responsibly than business students from state universities in their subsequent employment. Originality/value - Jesuit colleges of business purport to produce students who are more socially responsible than students attending colleges of business at state universities, but these claims have not been examined empirically.
Suggested Citation
David J. Burns & Pola B. Gupta & Steven D. Burns, 2013.
"Are business students at Jesuit universities more socially responsible?,"
Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(3), pages 454-464, July.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:srjpps:v:9:y:2013:i:3:p:454-464
DOI: 10.1108/SRJ-03-2012-0031
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:srjpps:v:9:y:2013:i:3:p:454-464. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.