IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/srjpps/v4y2008i4p474-490.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organization types and corporate social responsibility reporting in Finnish forest industry

Author

Listed:
  • Pasi Tuominen
  • Terhi Uski
  • Iiro Jussila
  • Ulla Kotonen

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to contribute to literature on corporate social responsibility by comparing CSR reporting between co‐operative organizations and listed companies. The authors aim to illustrate whether the different values and principles of co‐operatives and public limited companies result in differences in CSR reporting between these organization types. Design/methodology/approach - First, the authors introduce the concept of CSR reporting. Second, they extend their framework with some previous literature on co‐operation. Using qualitative methodology, they compare values and objectives as well as communication and reporting of the co‐operative to those of the listed companies. The analyses and the synthesis of CSR reporting and co‐operation literatures provides academics and practitioners with ideas on how to move towards a model of co‐operative CSR reporting. Findings - Values and principles of co‐operation do not significantly guide the CSR reporting of our case co‐operative. Instead, the issues emphasized in CSR reporting of our case co‐operative and the two investor‐owned companies are mostly related to common concern and the latest course of events throughout the world and the current issues in general. The study also indicates that the case co‐operative (Metsäliitto) falls behind in its CSR reporting to those of the listed companies (Stora Enso and UPM‐Kymmene). Research limitations/implications - While the study helps to understand the role of organization type in CSR reporting, as such the findings are limited to the context of the study. Practical implications - The paper provides a good point of departure for students and practitioners interested in CSR reporting and co‐operatives. Originality/value - To the authors' knowledge, so far the role of organization type (and the related differences in business objectives, values etc.) in CSR reporting has not received much of scholarly attention.

Suggested Citation

  • Pasi Tuominen & Terhi Uski & Iiro Jussila & Ulla Kotonen, 2008. "Organization types and corporate social responsibility reporting in Finnish forest industry," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 4(4), pages 474-490, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:srjpps:v:4:y:2008:i:4:p:474-490
    DOI: 10.1108/17471110810909885
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/17471110810909885/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/17471110810909885/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/17471110810909885?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:srjpps:v:4:y:2008:i:4:p:474-490. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.