IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/srjpps/srj-09-2019-0295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rhetoric and propriety judgments: reflections from bottled water

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffrey Gauthier
  • Jeffrey A. Kappen

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the rhetorical strategies used by organizations in support of propriety judgments concerning their products. Design/methodology/approach - The approach taken entails discourse and rhetorical analysis of texts produced by leading firms in the bottled water industry, and by the industry’s trade association, surrounding issues of sustainability. Findings - The analysis reveals rhetorical strategies invoked by firms to legitimate their economic, environmental and social performance. Research limitations/implications - This paper’s primary contribution is to research that informs the discursive aspects of legitimacy. As well, this study contributes to our nascent understanding of the microfoundations of sustainability. Originality/value - Our knowledge of how organizations use different discursive strategies in support of legitimacy is relatively underdeveloped. By examining rhetorical strategies used in support of propriety judgments concerning organizations’ environmental, social and economic legitimacy, this study begins to fill gaps in our understanding.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey Gauthier & Jeffrey A. Kappen, 2020. "Rhetoric and propriety judgments: reflections from bottled water," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(6), pages 861-876, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:srjpps:srj-09-2019-0295
    DOI: 10.1108/SRJ-09-2019-0295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/SRJ-09-2019-0295/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/SRJ-09-2019-0295/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/SRJ-09-2019-0295?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:srjpps:srj-09-2019-0295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.