Author
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyse the concepts of sustainability, responsibility and ethics focussing on their links and differences, also to understand how companies move respectively in these field; to understand how companies sometimes move away from the basic and deep meaning of these concepts, landing in a merely utilitarian sphere of personal advantage where ethics, instead of being an irreplaceable and essential stronghold, is found to be a fiction or just an instrument. Design/methodology/approach - The methodology used assumes a theoretical critical approach and, based on the vast literature on the items, is based on a conceptual analysis of the themes of sustainability, corporate social responsibility (CSR) and ethics and of the behaviour that companies can adopt in the three contexts. A critical approach to these issues and concepts can effectively help us to understand how companies are responding to external demands and to the challenges of responsibility and sustainability, which are becoming increasingly pressing. Findings - Ethics, sustainability, CSR and social and environmental reporting are distinct constructs with different meanings but linked by important conceptual and operational relationships. Research limitations/implications - The results of the research are the consequence of the application of a critical approach based on a theoretical analysis of the concepts under study. It would be interesting to support the results achieved with empirical research studies. Practical implications - This conceptual path helps scholars and companies themselves to understand the difference between the three key concepts analysed. Only by understanding the basic meaning will it be possible to really make one’s own and pursue it in the correct way. Social implications - Nowadays, the authors are overwhelmed by these three concepts which are used as synonyms and incorrectly. This leads to confusion and misunderstandings. Knowledge of the characteristics and differences between these concepts and their concrete applications is of great importance. Originality/value - This study tries to provide a critical discussion of how the three concepts intersect and differentiate, leading to concrete results or results that have nothing to do with their meaning. There are no conceptual papers in the literature that deal with the three concepts and also analyse the implications on the real world.
Suggested Citation
Riccardo Torelli, 2020.
"Sustainability, responsibility and ethics: different concepts for a single path,"
Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(5), pages 719-739, July.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:srjpps:srj-03-2020-0081
DOI: 10.1108/SRJ-03-2020-0081
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Martina Bianca Fuhrmann-Aoyagi & Kenji Miura & Kazuo Watanabe, 2024.
"Sustainability in Japan’s Agriculture: An Analysis of Current Approaches,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-26, January.
- Abdel-Aziz Ahmad Sharabati & Shafig Al-Haddad & Razan Abu Naba & Diana Hijazat & Ali Abdallah Alalwan & Ra’ed Masa’deh, 2023.
"How Consumers’ Consciousness Moderates the Corporate Social Responsibility Effect on Apparel Industry Brand Image,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.
- Matthew J. Spaniol & Evita Danilova-Jensen & Martin Nielsen & Carl Gyldenkærne Rosdahl & Clara Jasmin Schmidt, 2024.
"Defining Greenwashing: A Concept Analysis,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-17, October.
- Agung Satyadini & Ligang Song, 2023.
"Modern entrepreneurship and the ‘doughnut’: productive or destructive?,"
Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 37(2), pages 119-141, November.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:srjpps:srj-03-2020-0081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.