IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/sefpps/v32y2015i3p379-394.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimum portfolio selection using a hybrid genetic algorithm and analytic hierarchy process

Author

Listed:
  • Maghsoud Solimanpur
  • Gholamreza Mansourfar
  • Farzad Ghayour

Abstract

Purpose - – The purpose of this paper is to present a multi-objective model to the optimum portfolio selection using genetic algorithm and analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Portfolio selection is a multi-objective decision-making problem in financial management. Design/methodology/approach - – The proposed approach solves the problem in two stages. In the first stage, the portfolio selection problem is formulated as a zero-one mathematical programming model to optimize two objectives, namely, return and risk. A genetic algorithm (GA) with multiple fitness functions called as Multiple Fitness Functions Genetic Algorithm is applied to solve the formulated model. The proposed GA results in several non-dominated portfolios being in the Pareto (efficient) frontier. A decision-making approach based on AHP is then used in the second stage to select the portfolio from among the solutions obtained by GA which satisfies a decision-maker’s interests at most. Findings - – The proposed decision-making system enables an investor to find a portfolio which suits for his/her expectations at most. The main advantage of the proposed method is to provide prima-facie information about the optimal portfolios lying on the efficient frontier and thus helps investors to decide the appropriate investment alternatives. Originality/value - – The value of the paper is due to its comprehensiveness in which seven criteria are taken into account in the selection of a portfolio including return, risk, beta ratio, liquidity ratio, reward to variability ratio, Treynor’s ratio and Jensen’s alpha.

Suggested Citation

  • Maghsoud Solimanpur & Gholamreza Mansourfar & Farzad Ghayour, 2015. "Optimum portfolio selection using a hybrid genetic algorithm and analytic hierarchy process," Studies in Economics and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(3), pages 379-394, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:sefpps:v:32:y:2015:i:3:p:379-394
    DOI: 10.1108/SEF-08-2012-0085
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/SEF-08-2012-0085/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/SEF-08-2012-0085/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/SEF-08-2012-0085?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amarnath Bose, 2020. "Using genetic algorithm to improve consistency and retain authenticity in the analytic hierarchy process," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 57(4), pages 1070-1092, December.
    2. Oguzhan Ece & Ahmet Serhat Uludag, 2017. "Applicability of Fuzzy TOPSIS Method in Optimal Portfolio Selection and an Application in BIST," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(10), pages 107-127, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Genetic algorithm; Analytic hierarchy process; Portfolio selection; G11;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:sefpps:v:32:y:2015:i:3:p:379-394. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.