IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/sefpps/v25y2008i1p49-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the banking reforms in Serbia using survey results

Author

Listed:
  • A. Bitzenis
  • A. Misic
  • J. Marangos
  • Andreas Andronikidis

Abstract

Purpose - The main objective of this paper is to critically examine the effects of the ongoing reform process on the overall functioning of Serbia's banking system. It is essential that this reform process bears fruit by developing a sound, efficient and reliable banking system. Design/methodology/approach - The research results were obtained through exploratory field research. The interviews were aimed at capturing the attitudes of bank managers regarding the country's banking reform process and examining the context of the managers' feelings, thoughts, and actions. Findings - Based on questionnaire results collected from Serbia bank managers in 2004, the findings suggest that the reform process, although characterized as slow and sluggish due to a lack of customer's confidence in banks, has indeed improved the overall functioning of Serbia's banking sector. Research limitations/implications - This study's weakness is the fact that it was for the most part exploratory research. Conclusions can be drawn from the research, but not at the desired level of cause-and-effect. Practical implications - The Serbian banking reform process can offer lessons for both more and less advanced economies, as it exposes critical problems and mistakes that could be avoided and managed appropriately. Originality/value - This paper contributes to the research and literature on transition, as Serbia is an area of research in the transition literature, especially regarding the banking sector, which appears to be inadequate and limited.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Bitzenis & A. Misic & J. Marangos & Andreas Andronikidis, 2008. "Evaluating the banking reforms in Serbia using survey results," Studies in Economics and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 25(1), pages 49-71, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:sefpps:v:25:y:2008:i:1:p:49-71
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/10867370810857568?utm_campaign=RePEc&WT.mc_id=RePEc
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Serbia; Banks; Banking; Economic reform;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:sefpps:v:25:y:2008:i:1:p:49-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Virginia Chapman). General contact details of provider: http://www.emeraldinsight.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.