Author
Listed:
- Muhammad Ubaidillah Al Mustofa
- Mohammad Haidar Risyad
Abstract
Purpose - The study aims to investigate the impact of geopolitical risk (GPR), liberalization, institutions and financial markets on foreign direct investment (FDI). Design/methodology/approach - This study incorporates a quantitative approach through fixed effect estimation, combined with the dynamic panel analysis using generalized method of moments estimation, and uses country-level data across Muslim economies from 1990–2020. Findings - Good governance, a conducive environment and well-developed financial systems in destination markets yield heterogeneous outcomes when interacting with geopolitical tensions. This dynamic is particularly evident in both high and low economies, which tend to experience positive effects. In contrast, middle economies are disproportionately impacted, facing adverse consequences from reduced FDI inflows compared to other regions. Research limitations/implications - This research underscores the importance of ensuring stability, transparency and efficiency in Muslim economies to create a more resilient and attractive environment for FDI under geopolitical influence. Practical implications - Prioritizing the establishment of robust institutions, a resilient financial system and economic liberalization is essential for host economies, as it reduces over-dependence on specific economies that may be more vulnerable to geopolitical disruptions. Originality/value - Given the limited studies that explore the interplay of GPR, institutions, liberalization and financial market development in attracting FDI, particularly in Muslim economies, this research offers valuable insights for policymakers and scholars aiming to enhance foreign investment strategies and strengthen economic resilience.
Suggested Citation
Muhammad Ubaidillah Al Mustofa & Mohammad Haidar Risyad, 2025.
"Geopolitical risk and foreign direct investment: the role of liberalization, institutions and financial markets,"
Studies in Economics and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 42(4), pages 730-758, March.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:sefpps:sef-09-2024-0621
DOI: 10.1108/SEF-09-2024-0621
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:sefpps:sef-09-2024-0621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.