Author
Listed:
- Salha Ben Salem
- Olfa El Aoun
Abstract
Purpose - This study aims to investigate the dynamic spillover effects of banking indices returns across G7 and BRICS economies, focusing on the period of crisis events such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the Ukraine–Russia war. This paper provides significant policy implications for investors and portfolio managers. Design/methodology/approach - This study uses a quantile connectivity approach to analyze spillover effects in banking index returns across G7 and BRICS countries, focusing on extreme market conditions. Using monthly banking indices and a time-varying parameter VAR (TVP-VAR) model, the study captures dynamic volatility spillovers among 12 stock markets, offering flexibility to analyze time-varying relationships. It explores the interconnectedness of G7 and BRICS banking indices, calculating correlations and tracing spillovers using the Diebold and Yilmaz (2012, 2014) framework. The analysis highlights how structural shocks within the network impact volatility, providing insights into spillover dynamics under different market conditions. Findings - The analysis reveals a high degree of connectivity between G7 and BRICS banking systems, with total connectedness exceeding 80% during extreme market conditions, especially during crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the Ukraine–Russia war. G7 indices, particularly those of the USA and Germany, emerge as net transmitters of risk spillovers, while Japan, although part of the G7, acts as an exception with weaker spillover transmission. In contrast, BRICS banking indices, including those of Russia, India, China and South Africa, are found to be net receivers of spillovers, underscoring their vulnerability to global financial risks. In addition, the study shows that total connectedness is symmetric, with significant fluctuations based on event-driven volatility, particularly during crisis periods. Banking systems in France, the UK, Italy and Germany act as strong diversifiers, while Japan serves as a hedge asset due to its close connectivity to other banking systems, especially the USA. Brazil’s banking index is identified as a weak diversifier and safe haven, with limited protective capacity during crises. Overall, the study emphasizes the importance of understanding global spillover dynamics, offering valuable insights for managing risk and market volatility, especially in times of crisis. Originality/value - This study stands out for its use of a quantile connectivity approach to analyze dynamic spillover effects in G7 and BRICS banking indices, focusing on extreme market conditions during crises like COVID-19 and the Ukraine–Russia war. Using a TVP-VAR model allows capturing time-varying relationships and directional spillovers, revealing G7 indices as net risk transmitters (except Japan) and BRICS indices as net receivers. The findings emphasize the vulnerability of emerging markets, the diversification potential of G7 banking systems and the symmetric, event-driven nature of total connectedness. These insights provide valuable implications for risk management and policymaking in volatile global markets.
Suggested Citation
Salha Ben Salem & Olfa El Aoun, 2025.
"Banking index volatility and spillover effects in G7 and BRICS economies: a quantile connectedness approach,"
Studies in Economics and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 42(4), pages 836-864, May.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:sefpps:sef-01-2025-0046
DOI: 10.1108/SEF-01-2025-0046
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:sefpps:sef-01-2025-0046. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.