IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/regepp/rege-11-2017-001.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable public procurement: the Federal Public Institution’s shared system

Author

Listed:
  • Renato Cader Da Silva
  • Luciana Betiol
  • Teresa Villac
  • Raquel Nonato

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to report the experience of the Federal Public Institution with sustainable public procurement through the mechanism of shared acquisitions. Design/methodology/approach - The analysis adopted a qualitative approach and an empirical investigation of MPF’s experience, based on a documentary research and participant observation. Findings - The results allow the authors to demonstrate the economic, environmental and social advantages of the procurement made by MPF, thus granting to this new model of acquisition governance, the adherence to the organization’s institutional mission. Research limitations/implications - This is a single case study. Practical implications - It is a promising path that optimizes the institution’s use of its budgetary, human, logistical and information technology resources, focusing on the quality and sustainability of public biddings. Social implications - The process of collective construction, improvement of knowledge management, standardization, procedural and scale economies, and the use of sustainability criteria are the main reasons for the implementation of the sustainable shared acquisitions system in the institution. Originality/value - This is a development process of a new paradigm of procurement at MPF.

Suggested Citation

  • Renato Cader Da Silva & Luciana Betiol & Teresa Villac & Raquel Nonato, 2018. "Sustainable public procurement: the Federal Public Institution’s shared system," Revista de Gestão, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(1), pages 9-24, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:regepp:rege-11-2017-001
    DOI: 10.1108/REGE-11-2017-001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/REGE-11-2017-001/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/REGE-11-2017-001/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/REGE-11-2017-001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:regepp:rege-11-2017-001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.