Author
Listed:
- Vassilios Babalos
- Xolani Sibande
- Elie Bouri
- Rangan Gupta
Abstract
PurposeThis study aims to investigate herding behaviour in US Clean Energy (CE) exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and examine the role of climate risks in influencing such behaviour over the period from May 1, 2016, to June 19, 2024.Design/methodology/approachWe employ a baseline herding model and extend it to examine asymmetric effects across market conditions. The analysis incorporates time-varying herding measures and examines the impact of both transitional and physical climate risks on herding probability using regression techniques.FindingsThe baseline model reveals significant herding behaviour in CE ETFs. The extended model indicates that herding is present in both down and up markets, with a stronger effect in down markets, suggesting asymmetry. Herding is also found to be time-varying. Notably, high levels of transitional climate risk reduce the probability of herding in CE ETFs, whereas physical climate risk does not exert any significant impact on herding probability.Research limitations/implicationsThe study focuses specifically on US CE ETFs over a defined period, which may limit generalizability to other markets or asset classes. The findings provide insights into the behavioural dynamics of sustainable investment markets during periods of varying climate risk.Practical implicationsThe results suggest that high levels of transitional climate risk encourage market efficiency in CE ETFs and promote climate hedging behaviour by investors. This has important implications for portfolio managers and policymakers in understanding market dynamics in sustainable finance.Originality/valueThis study provides novel empirical evidence on the relationship between climate risks and herding behaviour in CE ETFs, contributing to the growing literature on behavioural finance in sustainable investment markets.
Suggested Citation
Vassilios Babalos & Xolani Sibande & Elie Bouri & Rangan Gupta, 2026.
"Do investors in clean energy ETFs herd? The role of climate risks,"
Review of Behavioral Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(1), pages 19-32, January.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:rbfpps:rbf-07-2025-0292
DOI: 10.1108/RBF-07-2025-0292
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:rbfpps:rbf-07-2025-0292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.