IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/rbfpps/rbf-07-2024-0208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leakage of floor price in OFS and proposed surveillance approach for Indian capital markets

Author

Listed:
  • Saurabh Maheshwari
  • Niti Nandini Chatnani

Abstract

Purpose - This study investigates potential floor price leakage during Offer for Sale (OFS) announcements in Indian capital markets. It aims to identify market anomalies and propose enhanced surveillance mechanisms to improve market integrity. Design/methodology/approach - Employing a quantitative research methodology, the study analyses 39 OFS cases from March 2012 to July 2023 on the National Stock Exchange (NSE) of India. It uses regression analysis, Karl Pearson’s correlation and chi-square tests to examine price movements in the cash and derivatives segments. Data were sourced from NSE Cogencis and Bloomberg terminals. Findings - The analysis reveals significant price declines in both cash and derivatives segments before OFS announcements for PSU companies, indicating symptoms of floor price leakage. For non-PSU companies, such patterns were observed only in the cash segment. These findings underscore the need for stricter pre-OFS surveillance. Research limitations/implications - The study’s findings advocate for enhanced regulatory oversight for OFS to address potential manipulation. Future research could expand on this by including broader datasets and examining other segments of the OFS mechanism. Practical implications - India’s OFS mechanism highlights the importance of robust surveillance and offers valuable lessons for global markets. Policymakers and regulators can use the insights provided by this study to develop effective frameworks to protect investor interests and enhance market efficiency. Regulators worldwide can adopt these measures to address information asymmetry, enhance transparency and prevent the leakage of price-sensitive information. These strategies can serve as a blueprint for fostering fair trading practices, strengthening regulatory effectiveness and ensuring market stability across jurisdictions. Social implications - By improving market fairness and transparency, the research supports more equitable market participation and bolsters investor confidence, which is crucial for the overall stability and integrity of financial markets. Originality/value - This paper provides empirical evidence of information asymmetry linked to OFS mechanisms, offering critical insights for regulatory reforms. It highlights vulnerabilities in the OFS and suggests targeted measures to safeguard market fairness.

Suggested Citation

  • Saurabh Maheshwari & Niti Nandini Chatnani, 2025. "Leakage of floor price in OFS and proposed surveillance approach for Indian capital markets," Review of Behavioral Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(3), pages 442-461, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:rbfpps:rbf-07-2024-0208
    DOI: 10.1108/RBF-07-2024-0208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/RBF-07-2024-0208/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/RBF-07-2024-0208/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/RBF-07-2024-0208?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    OFS; Floor price; Information leakage; Market surveillance; Manipulation; Behavioural biases and decision-making; G4 Behavioural Finance; G14 Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading; G18 Government policy and regulation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G4 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:rbfpps:rbf-07-2024-0208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.