Author
Abstract
PurposeThis paper addresses the conflicting views on whether traders become more risk-averse or more risk-seeking after experiencing trading shocks. It aims to uncover how the magnitude of prior gains or losses influences subsequent risk-taking behavior in retail trading.Design/methodology/approachUsing over 349,000 daily retail trading records, the study classifies trading shocks into 18 levels and examines their lagged effects on traders' risk-taking behavior, measured by leverage.FindingsTraders' responses to prior shocks exhibit clear asymmetry. After small shocks, whether gains or losses, traders become more risk-averse. In contrast, after large shocks, especially gains, they become increasingly risk-seeking. These effects scale with shock levels and fade over time. The switching point between risk aversion and risk seeking lies deeper in the loss domain.Practical implicationsBy revealing nonlinear post-shock risk preferences, this study suggests design opportunities for trading platforms, such as nudging tools to prevent excessive risk-taking after large shocks. It also informs risk management systems that aim to reduce over-leverage during volatile periods.Originality/valueThis paper introduces a detailed framework for analyzing aftershock risk preferences, offering a behavioral explanation for previous mixed findings. It contributes to the literature by revealing a nonlinear, asymmetric pattern in how risk preferences respond to shocks.
Suggested Citation
Guiming Han & Alex Preda, 2026.
"How trading shocks shape risk preferences: nonlinear evidence from retail forex traders,"
Review of Behavioral Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(2), pages 286-304, February.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:rbfpps:rbf-06-2025-0229
DOI: 10.1108/RBF-06-2025-0229
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:rbfpps:rbf-06-2025-0229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.