Author
Listed:
- Rasyidi Faiz Akbar
- Ninditya Nareswari
- Ina Uswatun Nihaya
- Yuyun Isbanah
Abstract
PurposeThis study compares the market-specific safe-haven performance of gold, the US dollar, and Bitcoin across advanced and emerging equity markets and examines whether daily changes in geopolitical risk are associated with conditional volatility in equity markets.Design/methodology/approachUsing daily data from 5th January, 2016 to 9th March, 2026, the study applies market-specific exponential generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models with exogenous variables (EGARCH-X) and dynamic conditional correlation generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (DCC-GARCH) models, as well as downside safe-haven regressions, across eight equity markets. The downside models evaluate asset performance under bottom-10% and bottom-5% equity-market conditions.FindingsStandardized daily changes in geopolitical risk are statistically insignificant at the 5% level across all EGARCH-X variance specifications. The DCC-GARCH estimates reveal predominantly negative correlations between the US dollar and equity markets, correlations around zero for gold, and mostly positive correlations for Bitcoin. Under bottom-5% conditions, the US dollar provides the broadest protection, servin g as a strong safe haven in two markets and a weak one in three. Gold provides weak protection in one market, whereas Bitcoin exhibits limited safe-haven performance.Originality/valueThe study distinguishes time-varying diversification characteristics from actual downside protection, demonstrating that predominantly negative dynamic correlations do not necessarily translate into safe-haven effectiveness during severe equity-market declines.
Suggested Citation
Rasyidi Faiz Akbar & Ninditya Nareswari & Ina Uswatun Nihaya & Yuyun Isbanah, 2026.
"Dynamic diversification and downside safe-haven performance: evidence from gold, the US dollar, and Bitcoin,"
Review of Behavioral Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pages 1-22, October.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:rbfpps:rbf-03-2026-0151
DOI: 10.1108/RBF-03-2026-0151
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:rbfpps:rbf-03-2026-0151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.